|
Publications: |
| By Type |
| By Topic |
|
Air Pollution
|
| About Me |
|
© 2003 Joel
Schwartz
Site design |
|
|
|
Reports |
 |
|
|
||
|
||
| Rethinking
the California Air Resources Board's New 8-hour Ozone Standard [link] American Enterprise Institute, September 12, 2005 |
||
| Air
Quality False Alarm: An Analysis of the Natural Resources Defense
Council's Heat Advisory Report [link] March 24, 2005 |
||
| Ethanol
and Air Quality in Minnesota
[link] American Enterprise Institute, February 2005 |
||
| Report
Card on the Bush Administration's Air Quality Regulatory Policies
and Performance [link] Property and Environment Research Center, October 2004 |
||
| A
Regulatory Analysis of EPA's Proposed Rule to Reduce Mercury Emissions
from Utility Boilers [link] AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, September 2004 |
||
| Finding
Better Ways to Achieve Cleaner Air [link] AEI Environmental Policy Outlook, September-October 2004 |
||
| Clearing
the Air in North Carolina [link] John Locke Foundation, August 2004 |
||
| Air
Quality in America: A Dose of Reality on Air Pollution Levels, Trends, and Health Risks [link] American Enterprise Institute, April 28, 2004 |
||
| Clearing the Air [link] Regulation, Summer 2003 |
||
| Public
Interest Comment on EPA's Proposed Nonroad Engine and Fuel Standards [link] Mercatus Center, August 20, 2003 |
||
| Public
Interest Comment on EPA's Proposed Rule for Implementing the 8-hour Ozone Standard [link] Mercatus Center, August 1, 2003 |
||
| No Way
Back: Why Air Pollution Will Continue to Decline [link] American Enterprise Institute, July 2003 |
||
| Comments on the California Energy Commission’s Report
“Reducing California’s Petroleum Dependence” [link] Reason Public Policy Institute, June 6, 2003 |
||
| Comments on NRDC’s Testimony on Power Plant Regulation
[link] Competitive Enterprise Institute, May 30, 2003 |
||
| Particulate Air Pollution: Weighing the Risks [link] Competitive Enterprise Institute, April 2003 |
||
| Public
Interest Comment on Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Proposed
Chemical Selection Approach for Initial Round of Screening [link] Mercatus Center, March 17, 2003 |
||
| Mid-Term Report Card: Bush Administration’s Environmental
Policy (Air Quality Section) [link] Political Economy Research Center, January 2003 |
||
| Extended Producer Responsibility: Reexamining its
Role in Environmental Progress [link] Reason Public Policy Institute, June 2002 |
||
| How the
American Lung Association’s “State of the Air 2002” Report Misleads
the Public about Air Pollution and Health [link] Reason Public Policy Institute, April 30, 2002 |
||
| Hormonally Active Chemicals in the Environment [full report] [summary] Reason Public Policy Institute, April 2002 |
||
| Enhanced Smog Check and Bay Area Air Pollution Transport
Fact Sheet [link] Reason Public Policy Institute, March 29, 2002 |
||
| Breathe
Easier on Asthma-Air Pollution Link [link] National Center for Public Policy Analysis, March 21, 2002 |
||
| Grading
the Graders: How Advocacy Groups’ “Report Cards” Mislead the
Public on Air Pollution and Urban Transport [link] Reason Public Policy Institute, December 6, 2001 |
||
| New Study
Distorts Health Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Reduction [link] Reason Public Policy Institute, August 21, 2001 |
||
| Breathe
Easier: The American Lung Association’s Misleading "State of the Air
2001" [link] Reason Public Policy Institute, May 4, 2001 |
||
| I/M
Programs: A Look at Where We've Been and Where We're Going [link] Presentation to the National Research Council I/M Panel, February 15, 2000 |
||
| Improving
Evaluation of Mobile Source Policies (paper [link];
powerpoint [link]) Presentation to the National Research Council Mobile Source Emissions Modeling Panel, March 4, 1999 |
||
| Remote
Sensing of Vehicle Emissions: State of the Technology, Potential Applications,
Cost Estimates, and Recommendations [link] California I/M Review Committee, September 9, 1998 |
||
| Clarification
of Misconceptions Regarding the Sacramento RSD Pilot Program [link]
California I/M Review Committee, March 31, 1995 |
||
| Reply
to "EPA Summary Response to the California Review Committee Report
on I/M Effectiveness [link] California I/M Review Committee, March 20, 1995 |
||
| An
Analysis of the USEPA's 50-Percent Discount for Decentralized I/M
Programs [link] California I/M Review Committee, February 24, 1995 |
||